Early M37 Main Shaft Falure

Discuss fixes, upgrades and modifications to your M37

Moderators: Cal_Gary, T. Highway, Monkey Man, robi

Post Reply
User avatar
sturmtyger380
SFC
SFC
Posts: 577
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:13 pm
Location: Up State SC

Early M37 Main Shaft Falure

Post by sturmtyger380 »

I got my transmission back together so I started pulling Chris's apart. We knew the snap ring was gone as all the gears would slide on the main shaft.

What happens when the early transmission main shaft fails and the snap ring comes off.

Failed shaft.

Image

New shaft showing the groove and how little metal there is to hold all the gear assembly on.

Image

The snap ring was floating between the end of the main shaft and the synchronizer. I expected it to be chewed up but it was only bent a little.

Alan
47 CJ2A
53 M38A1
52 M37
51 M38
67 M416
?? M101A1
T. Highway
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1818
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:57 am
Location: S.E. Wisconsin, USA, Earth

Re: Early M37 Main Shaft Falure

Post by T. Highway »

Hi Alan,

I wonder if this happens as a cascade effect or all at once failure? I've known about this weakness for some time but have never seen it in person or pictures. Thanks for sharing.

Bert
1952 M37 W/W Rebuild @ 59% complete
Engine rebuild @ 95% complete
1985 M1009, 1990 M101A2, 2008 M116A3 Pioneer tool trailer
MVPA # 24265
NRA Life Member
NRA Cert. Personal Protection Pistol Instructor
NRA Cert. RSO
Class III RSO/KCR
Chris P
CPL
CPL
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:39 pm
Location: Clemson, SC

Re: Early M37 Main Shaft Falure

Post by Chris P »

The symptom was that it would occasionally pop out of gear when I used 3rd to descend hills slowly.
Chris P
1954 M37
MVPA
MHCC
MSeriesRebuild
1SG
1SG
Posts: 2832
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:35 am
Location: Norwood, NC
Contact:

Re: Early M37 Main Shaft Falure

Post by MSeriesRebuild »

The common cause of this failure is simple. The snap rings are available in 4 different thicknesses. You need to install the thickest ring that will work in your application. Most people pay that no attention using whatever ring is handy. If the ring used is not thick enough; the assembly has a slight amount of end play. Any end play at all allows the assembly to move forward every time you shift gears, eventually either the ring is forced off the shaft or the spline grooves in the shaft become fatigued and break off. If the transmission is built correctly to the best it can be; they actually give little trouble.
Charles Talbert
www.mseriesrebuild.com
ashyers
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 848
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 8:20 pm
Location: Oakland CA

Re: Early M37 Main Shaft Falure

Post by ashyers »

Anyone know where to obtain a set of nice new retaining rings for the main shaft? I'm going to be needing one soon.

Here's an interesting solution to a similar problem in another gearbox:

http://www.sonnax.com/parts/1696-transf ... g-retainer

Andy
Elwood
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 950
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:34 am
Location: Water Winter Wonderland

Re: Early M37 Main Shaft Falure

Post by Elwood »

ashyers wrote:Anyone know where to obtain a set of nice new retaining rings for the main shaft? I'm going to be needing one soon.

Here's an interesting solution to a similar problem in another gearbox:

http://www.sonnax.com/parts/1696-transf ... g-retainer

Andy
I'm not as familiar with the 88950 trans, but some of the small bits for the later NP420 (snap rings, etc.) are the same as used in the NP435, and small parts kits for that trans are readily available from places like Novak Conversions and quad4x4. (Edit: after cross referencing the part nos., it looks like none of the snap rings or shims are common between the NP420 and 88950.)

The mainshaft in the NP420 is vulnerable to the same sort of failure. Of the three NP420 transmissions that I disassembled in the last year, two of them had broken mainshafts similar to the photo in the first post above.

As Charles mentioned above, too much freeplay between the snap ring thickness and the width of those grooves is not good. Too little freeplay isn't good either, i.e. don't try to wedge a too-thick snap ring into place.
“When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, IT IS THEIR RIGHT, IT IS THEIR DUTY, TO THROW OFF SUCH GOVERNMENT...” -Declaration of Independence, 1776
ashyers
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 848
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 8:20 pm
Location: Oakland CA

Re: Early M37 Main Shaft Falure

Post by ashyers »

Elwood,
Thanks for trying to help. The snap ring and splines in our transmission looked OK, but the ring did have some fretting and I don't plan on attempting to reuse it.

Hopefully I can find something that will work. If I can find one that's too thick I'll have it ground to size.

I guess that ring/spline combo takes a hit every missed shift when the dogs bounce across each others faces. Especially in the 2-3 shift.

Andy
User avatar
sturmtyger380
SFC
SFC
Posts: 577
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:13 pm
Location: Up State SC

Re: Early M37 Main Shaft Falure

Post by sturmtyger380 »

When I rebuilt Chris's transmission he contacted Charles and got a selection of snap rings from him in varying thicknesses.

Charles has them made for him. I put my calipers on them and put them in order of thickness. The first one I tried was the thinnest and it was too loose. The next thicker one fit in the grove very nice.

Alan
47 CJ2A
53 M38A1
52 M37
51 M38
67 M416
?? M101A1
Post Reply