1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Discuss fixes, upgrades and modifications to your M37

Moderators: Cal_Gary, T. Highway, Monkey Man, robi

User avatar
mike_l
SGT
SGT
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Marion, IN
Contact:

1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by mike_l »

Greetings all,

I have a late style pintle on my 1954. Now, by late style, I mean the pintle hook and pivoting shaft are one piece instead of two piece as on the early M37s. I had always thought those were the B1 style pintle so they wouldn't have been used before 1958. So, I found an early style (two piece as in the TM) but I wasn't able to swap them out. The hole pattern is the same-1 large hole in center, 4 holes around the center for the back 'flange' plate. The difference was my holes were smaller and I had an additional 4 hole pattern around the 'flange' plate holes where a reinforcing plate is bolted on. It would not physically fit. I'll try to get photos posted this weekend.

Rather than just drill the holes out larger to fit the old style pintle, I first wanted to ask if anyone else who has a '54, has noticed this. I talked to another M37 owner and he said his '54 had the later pintle on it until he drilled his holes out to fit the earlier pintle. My delivery date is March but he couldn't remember his. Is it possible there was a production change in '54? I had also thought that maybe the crossmember had been changed out at some point. Seems like a lot of work but I suppose it would have been something depot could have done rather than scrap an entire frame.

Production change or a depot repair - any ideas?
Mike
Marion, IN
1954 M37 W/OW
1953 M101
Indiana MVPA
Cal_Gary
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4262
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:51 am
Location: Draper, Utah

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by Cal_Gary »

I have the exact problem on my '54 so I removed the pivot flange and affixed the pintle directly to the crossmember using the existing bolts. Can't pivot but can at least pull a trailer.
Gary
Cal_Gary
1954 M37 W/W
MVPA Correspondent #28500
User avatar
mike_l
SGT
SGT
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Marion, IN
Contact:

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by mike_l »

Thanks for the feedback. That's interesting. Gary, what is your delivery date on your truck? So, at least three '54s are known to have the later style pintle/crossmember configuration.

Don't know why they would change them unless they found the pintle design shared with the M38A1 & 1/4ton trailer wasn't strong enough for the 3/4ton trailer loads. But, there was no refit/MWO to change trucks already delivered was there?

And, can we presume those with non-pivoting pintles are running the same configuration as Gary's truck-early style pintle hook bolted directly to a late style crossmember?

It might be too early but I smell a production change.
Mike
Marion, IN
1954 M37 W/OW
1953 M101
Indiana MVPA
User avatar
DAP
SSGT
SSGT
Posts: 260
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Waxhaw, NC

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by DAP »

I have 3 rear cross members for sale that I have removed from 1950s trucks not the newer 1960s models when I scrapped out some M37s. 1 of them has the smaller hole for the "fixed" pintle hitch and the closer spaced 4 holes. The other 2 have a bigger hole for the center shaft and the 4 bolts are spaced out further for the reinforcing plate that goes on the foward side. I wish I had tracked the serial numbers closer.
All in Air Force blue and black trim
1962 M37B1
rectangular window hardtop, converted to Hercules 4 cyl diesel-intercooled & turbo charged, 12V, disc brakes
1962 M116A1 Generator trailer
1962 M116A1 Pioneer tool trailer
1964 M101A1 3/4 ton trailer
Cal_Gary
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4262
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:51 am
Location: Draper, Utah

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by Cal_Gary »

Mine was delivered in April '54. i considered drilling out the center hole, then noticed that the pivot nut would have been extremely close to my fuel tank, so I didn't do it.
Gary
Cal_Gary
1954 M37 W/W
MVPA Correspondent #28500
User avatar
DAP
SSGT
SSGT
Posts: 260
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Waxhaw, NC

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by DAP »

The one I had installed had about 1/2" clearance. You had to slide the shaft part way in and start the nut and tighten down. At the end there wasn't enough room to get a box end wrench over the nut and clear the fuel tank so you have to use an open end. But it does fit without hitting the tank.
All in Air Force blue and black trim
1962 M37B1
rectangular window hardtop, converted to Hercules 4 cyl diesel-intercooled & turbo charged, 12V, disc brakes
1962 M116A1 Generator trailer
1962 M116A1 Pioneer tool trailer
1964 M101A1 3/4 ton trailer
User avatar
mike_l
SGT
SGT
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Marion, IN
Contact:

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by mike_l »

That's how I put mine back on - partially in and keep feeding it in until the nut was seated. I have about the same clearance.

Thanks for the info, more '54s with late style pintles!
Mike
Marion, IN
1954 M37 W/OW
1953 M101
Indiana MVPA
Milsurp
PFC
PFC
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:27 am

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by Milsurp »

I just went outside and looked at mine and, it is a non-swivel Pintle. It is bolted directly to the cross-member. Also, when you say swivel-type, are you referring to it rotating clockwise? Because mine does not. It "opens" by pulling the small lever on top and that is how it opens up.
Also, the delivery date of my M37, was 26-Jan-54

I hope this helps.
User avatar
mike_l
SGT
SGT
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Marion, IN
Contact:

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by mike_l »

Milsurp,

Yes, by swivel I meant rotating. The pintle should rotate 360 degrees, clockwise or counter. The ones that are bolted to the frame are the early style pintle hook without the adapter (rotating shaft that passes through the frame) bolted straight to the frame crossmember. The adapter may have been taken off for some reason (damaged?). Another reason may be the crossmember is a later style and the early adapter won't fit so the pintle hook was bolted directly to the frame. I'm starting to lean toward the latter.

Check your holes on the crossmember to see which pattern they fit. I posted a sketch up in my album here.
Mike
Marion, IN
1954 M37 W/OW
1953 M101
Indiana MVPA
06boblee
SFC
SFC
Posts: 593
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Quinlan, Texas

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by 06boblee »

My build date is 2-11-54. Mine has the swivel type pintle. The pintle is the one piece type.
'54 M37 wew
MVPA #16921
Milsurp
PFC
PFC
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:27 am

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by Milsurp »

mike_l wrote:Milsurp,

Yes, by swivel I meant rotating. The pintle should rotate 360 degrees, clockwise or counter. The ones that are bolted to the frame are the early style pintle hook without the adapter (rotating shaft that passes through the frame) bolted straight to the frame crossmember. The adapter may have been taken off for some reason (damaged?). Another reason may be the crossmember is a later style and the early adapter won't fit so the pintle hook was bolted directly to the frame. I'm starting to lean toward the latter.

Check your holes on the crossmember to see which pattern they fit. I posted a sketch up in my album here.
Excellent sketch and diagram, Mike. I went outside and checked, and sure enough, the original holes are there which coincides with the measurements of your drawing. However, where my pintle is secured, the distance between the bolts is 3 1/2" x 1.5"
Milsurp
PFC
PFC
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:27 am

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by Milsurp »

this is what mine looks like, only it is OD Green, and the wire clip thing is not on mine. Plus, mine has zerk grease fittings.

Image
maxim
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:52 am
Location: Michigan

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by maxim »

12-20-51 delivery date WOW/Ord Dept. Swiveling pintle. No evidence of different holes.
Sal
SFC
SFC
Posts: 516
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:22 pm
Location: N.Y.

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by Sal »

This is the one that was on my truck . And the Delivery date is 4-12-54

Image

Sal
:mrgreen:
1954 M37 WO/W
1969 M101A1
1967 M416
User avatar
mike_l
SGT
SGT
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:02 am
Location: Marion, IN
Contact:

Re: 1954 Rear Crossmember Design

Post by mike_l »

Milsurp,
Yes, that sounds like it would be the early style pintle hook without the adapter being bolted straight to the crossmember.

Sal,
That is the one-piece/late style pintle that is on my truck also.

As an update, I sent emails out to all the '54 owners in the registry. Every response except one has been they have the one-piece/late style pintle. The earliest truck I've heard back from has a delivery date of 23 January and it also has the one-piece/late style pintle. Is it possible these were in service as early as late '53? I'm finding from the responses, they were certainly common to the '54s. It really is starting to look like a production change.
Mike
Marion, IN
1954 M37 W/OW
1953 M101
Indiana MVPA
Post Reply