unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Talk about your truck here

Moderators: Cal_Gary, T. Highway, Monkey Man, robi

Elwood
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 937
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:34 am
Location: Water Winter Wonderland

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by Elwood »

Looks like Sal nailed it.

Ordnance p/n 7350311, "STOP, rear door step (M43)", Group 1501, quan = 2
“When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, IT IS THEIR RIGHT, IT IS THEIR DUTY, TO THROW OFF SUCH GOVERNMENT...” -Declaration of Independence, 1776
06boblee
SFC
SFC
Posts: 593
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Quinlan, Texas

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by 06boblee »

Sal wrote:This picture might be of some help. It's of a M43 chassis .

M43 REAR a.jpg
Sal
:mrgreen:
another mystery solved!
'54 M37 wew
MVPA #16921
DJ
SSGT
SSGT
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:28 pm
Location: Eau Claire, Wi

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by DJ »

Cabin fever must be sitting in, little holes causing a lot of discussion. Hope spring gets here soon.
Elwood
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 937
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:34 am
Location: Water Winter Wonderland

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by Elwood »

DJ wrote:Cabin fever must be sitting in, little holes causing a lot of discussion. Hope spring gets here soon.
I was just thinking about asking which oil to use in my engine, transmission, transfer case, differentials, steering box, and winch... :lol:
“When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, IT IS THEIR RIGHT, IT IS THEIR DUTY, TO THROW OFF SUCH GOVERNMENT...” -Declaration of Independence, 1776
isaac_alaska
SFC
SFC
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 10:44 pm
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska and Nome, AK

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by isaac_alaska »

i got a 5gallon can of Shell Omala 460 for the low price of "free 99" from the distributor. turns out it has a "5 year shelf life" after which point they gotta toss it. really slippery stuff!
Isaac
Fairbanks, AK
Civilian WM300 on DC3 tires
'52 M37 on 11x16 Michelin
'52 M37 on Apple R-1 tractor tires
Photo Gallery
just me
1SG
1SG
Posts: 1197
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by just me »

Winch lube.
"It may be ugly, but at least it is slow!"
just me
1SG
1SG
Posts: 1197
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by just me »

I was surrounded by complete and original ambulances this past weekend. (Over 30 of them.) Not one had those brackets on the rear. The fold up steps I fiddled with were narrower than the stops in the picture. Maybe it was one of those things that got dropped early on like the primer pump and accessory Jack on the dash.
"It may be ugly, but at least it is slow!"
User avatar
w30bob
1SG
1SG
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:23 am

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by w30bob »

C'mon guys.......this is easy! They're lightening holes to keep the M37's weight manageable. Dodge had to meet the Army's specification for max gross vehicle weight somehow.

:mrgreen:

later,
bob
Elwood
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 937
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:34 am
Location: Water Winter Wonderland

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by Elwood »

w30bob wrote:C'mon guys.......this is easy! They're lightening holes to keep the M37's weight manageable. Dodge had to meet the Army's specification for max gross vehicle weight somehow.

:mrgreen:

later,
bob
Bob, I think you're confusing the M37 with the '63 swiss cheese Pontiac. :lol:
“When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, IT IS THEIR RIGHT, IT IS THEIR DUTY, TO THROW OFF SUCH GOVERNMENT...” -Declaration of Independence, 1776
52PLOWERWAGON
SFC
SFC
Posts: 549
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:56 pm
Location: upper mi

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by 52PLOWERWAGON »

bob I was also thinking weight reduction ......

but then I looked at the rest of the truck :mrgreen:

mine does have a super rare weight reduction kit under the headlights :lol: :roll: :wink:
Thanks,TRAVIS
When it comes to gambling I don't play the Powerball, I play the Powerwagon

1952 M37 FARM TRUCK
230 W/THRUSH EXHAUST, DELETED HEAT RISER AND 12 VOLT IGNITION

1941 WC RATROD
w/ 5 TON MULTIFUEL TURBO DIESEL
User avatar
w30bob
1SG
1SG
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:23 am

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by w30bob »

Travis,

If you're referring to the "rusted out bolt holes in the fender under the headlights" super rare weight reduction...........it ain't so rare! :lol:

Think how bad-ass the M37 would be if the body was made out of aluminum instead of steel........it might actually accelerate when you hit the gas!

later,
bob
52PLOWERWAGON
SFC
SFC
Posts: 549
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:56 pm
Location: upper mi

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by 52PLOWERWAGON »

if they were aluminum I wouldn't have bought one :lol: :lol:

think how junk they would be when that aluminum oxidizes :shock:

please don't even get me started on aluminum bob :mrgreen:
Thanks,TRAVIS
When it comes to gambling I don't play the Powerball, I play the Powerwagon

1952 M37 FARM TRUCK
230 W/THRUSH EXHAUST, DELETED HEAT RISER AND 12 VOLT IGNITION

1941 WC RATROD
w/ 5 TON MULTIFUEL TURBO DIESEL
Elwood
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 937
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:34 am
Location: Water Winter Wonderland

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by Elwood »

Had the G-741 series been built with aluminum bodywork, there would likely have been fewer built (expensive), and also likely be very, very few of them left. The value of the aluminum would have resulted in scrapping of most of them once they reached the end of their military service lives.

The second series of G-741 contact maintenance trucks, the CMU-5, and the USAF R-2 crash truck, did have partial aluminum bodies. I don't know the survival rates, but I'd bet that a lot of these trucks (or at least their light-weight bodywork) went to the scrapper just to recover the aluminum.

Plower, I'm guessing that you aren't a fan of the new Ford trucks? :lol:

And Bob, a properly tuned M37 flathead 230 has neck snapping acceleration...from zero to about four miles-per-hour, when the engine hits the rev limit in first gear. :wink:
“When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, IT IS THEIR RIGHT, IT IS THEIR DUTY, TO THROW OFF SUCH GOVERNMENT...” -Declaration of Independence, 1776
52PLOWERWAGON
SFC
SFC
Posts: 549
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:56 pm
Location: upper mi

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by 52PLOWERWAGON »

I am a fan of the new ford trucks .......

I mean I am a huge fan of making fun of all ford trucks :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

there is a reason I bought a 52 dodge m37
because I needed a real truck NOTa beercan on wheels :lol:

just sayin'
Thanks,TRAVIS
When it comes to gambling I don't play the Powerball, I play the Powerwagon

1952 M37 FARM TRUCK
230 W/THRUSH EXHAUST, DELETED HEAT RISER AND 12 VOLT IGNITION

1941 WC RATROD
w/ 5 TON MULTIFUEL TURBO DIESEL
Elwood
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 937
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:34 am
Location: Water Winter Wonderland

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?

Post by Elwood »

Umm...this may be before your time, but up until the 1970s, beer was sold in steel cans. The switch to aluminum cans is a relatively recent thing (for us old guys, anyways).
“When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, IT IS THEIR RIGHT, IT IS THEIR DUTY, TO THROW OFF SUCH GOVERNMENT...” -Declaration of Independence, 1776
Post Reply