Wisconsin Passes Historic Military Vehicle Law!!

Discuss all non M37 related issues here

Moderators: Cal_Gary, T. Highway, Monkey Man, robi

Post Reply
User avatar
creinemann
SGT
SGT
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:56 am
Location: Jefferson, WI
Contact:

Wisconsin Passes Historic Military Vehicle Law!!

Post by creinemann »

Wisconsin Legislature Passed a law formerly allowing the operation and registration of former Military Vehicles!! Prior to this the WI DOT was canceling and revoking registrations for historic military vehicles, now we can have statutory protection for our vehicles... The assembly and senate passed the bill on a unanimous voice vote.

The bill is now to go to the Gov for his signature.

Thanks to Jeff Rowsam, and eveyone in Wisconsin who burned the midnight oil, sent faxes, emails, letters, offered testimony and really help get this through!

Carl
Carl Reinemann

1953 M37 USAAF
1953 M101 Trailer
1961 M416
Too many military collectibles to mention

http://m37.crwdesigns.com
M37 Restoration Site
http://dodgem37.com
http://facebook.com/creinemann
http://legendary-antiques.com
User avatar
rixm37
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:05 am
Location: Tucson AZ

Post by rixm37 »

What a great relief for everyone in Wisconsin.
Further it is a great moment for all military vehicle owners in all the states as now a precedent has been.
1952 M37
M101 trailer
1942 Chevy G506
Josh
SFC
SFC
Posts: 702
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:02 pm

Post by Josh »

excellent.

I sent a letter to my rep and told him that I've dumped thousands into the local economy rebuilding mine, and that if I wasn't allowed to register it, I would move back to MI, and my fiancee and I would take our 80K a year income with us... not sure if it helped, but, apparently it didn't hurt!
Image
cuz
1SG
1SG
Posts: 1147
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:40 pm
Location: Northwestern Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by cuz »

It is a step forward. It will still need some serious amendments over the next few years. As it stands MV's will have to get the new MV plate and there are a lot of restrictions on use that virtually eliminate pleasure driving and commercial use.
Wes K
wsknettl@centurytel.net

54 M37, 66 M101, 45MB, 51 M38, 60 CJ5, 46 T3-C
MVPA 22099

Disclaimer: Any data posted is for general info only and may not be M37 specific or meet with the approval of some esteemed gurus.
Master Yota
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:50 am
Location: Prince George BC Canada
Contact:

Post by Master Yota »

Its a good start however.

Up here in Northern BC we don't have much in the way of MV restrictions, other than the Insurance companies and the DOT don't like tracks on the road surface. Steel tracks anyway - rubber ones are ok! Plus it has to be capable of maintaining a "somewhat" safe speed on the road.

We have a similar plate though for antique vehicles (anything over 25 years old, and original in appearance). The insurance is cheap, but the limits imposed make operating the vehicle very difficult unless the stars are in total alignment under your zodiac sign... :roll:
Ray
1953 CDN. M37
1954 CDN. M152
Lifer
1SG
1SG
Posts: 2096
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 3:50 am
Location: Elberton, Georgia, USA

Post by Lifer »

Master Yota wrote:...the limits imposed make operating the vehicle very difficult unless the stars are in total alignment under your zodiac sign... :roll:
Not to worry, Yota! I distinctly remember hearing a few years ago that "This is the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius!" Could it be that we are now witnessing the "Dawning of the Age of Pisces?" Nah! There's just something fishy about that idea. :twisted:
"PER ARDUA AD ITER"
WarrenD
SSGT
SSGT
Posts: 473
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:55 am
Location: CT
Contact:

Post by WarrenD »

Lifer wrote:
Master Yota wrote:...the limits imposed make operating the vehicle very difficult unless the stars are in total alignment under your zodiac sign... :roll:
Not to worry, Yota! I distinctly remember hearing a few years ago that "This is the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius!" Could it be that we are now witnessing the "Dawning of the Age of Pisces?" Nah! There's just something fishy about that idea. :twisted:
Now that's just foul! :?
Nickathome
1SG
1SG
Posts: 1083
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:47 pm
Location: West Grove, Pa

WI

Post by Nickathome »

Good to hear that finally some level heads have prevailed.

I wouldn't be too overly concerned about "restrictions" on driving in your state under the new MV plate. I'm sure your state it will be similar to ours here in Pa, whereas the law will more than likely be loosely enforced at best.

My truck is registered as an antique, which comes with certain driving restrictions, such as to and from parades and shows, no commercial hauling, and one day per week recreational driving. Bottom line is I drive any time I want without fear of anything happening. Its so laxed that I don't even give it a thought, just hop in and go. If I ever get pulled over, the LEO better know the antique laws or I'll see them in court because the antique laws are so vague, you can pretty much read anything you want into it. Besides, all I need to do is say I am just coming back from the gas station and I'm sure they'd let me slide.
Cal_Gary
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4353
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:51 am
Location: Draper, Utah

Post by Cal_Gary »

Congrats, Wisconsin! I've been following that issue thru the MVPA journals and know what a serious issue it is. I'd be very alarmed if CA tried this, but no worries, the state of the state is cash-poor so they'll just keep taxing us and our HMVs. Anything goes as long as you're "paid up"! :wink:
Gary
Cal_Gary
1954 M37 W/W
MVPA Correspondent #28500
G741.org Forum member since 2004
skinnedknuckles
CPL
CPL
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:05 pm
Location: South central Wisconsin

Post by skinnedknuckles »

At least now our mv's will be better defined with the WiDot so they can get some statistical information on them. :D It is a good start in the right direction. I was at most of the public hearings with the dot and senate commitees (missed the last one) and it was interesting to say the least. The MVPA's Jeff Rowsam and Pinzgauer owner Paul Underwood did pretty good for our cause. At least we can drive and register them. It probably won't change things much about how most of us use them as long as we aren't doing something extremely wrong. But it has not become a law yet until the Governor signs it
Paul in Janesville, Wis
1953 m37
1962 m37B1
1969 m101a2
1971 m35a2 4x4 w/w
1971 m35a2 6x6
and yes I have Jeeps
MVPA and MVPG member
snowdad
SGT
SGT
Posts: 246
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:25 pm
Location: Red Boiling Springs, TN

Post by snowdad »

Maybe I missed it, but why were they revoking them? On what grounds were they doing this?
Phillip
cuz
1SG
1SG
Posts: 1147
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:40 pm
Location: Northwestern Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by cuz »

There is a law on the books here that says vehicles designed primarily for off road use will not be titled and licensed. The issue became intense when a DMV troop interpreted the law to apply to Pinzgauers and refuse to title or license the vehicle. The WIS DOT backed up that interpretation and the Pinzgauer guys made a stink about it. The WIS DOT reacted as expected and put a Hiatus on all pending applications for title and license for MVs and initiated a review of those already titled. This of course threatened all MVs hence two separate groups lobbied the Wisconsin Legislature to pass laws specifically allowing the title and licensing of MVs. One just for the Pinzgauers and one designed for all MV's. The all MVs bill passed with many limitations attached.
Wes K
wsknettl@centurytel.net

54 M37, 66 M101, 45MB, 51 M38, 60 CJ5, 46 T3-C
MVPA 22099

Disclaimer: Any data posted is for general info only and may not be M37 specific or meet with the approval of some esteemed gurus.
Post Reply