Page 2 of 3
Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:54 pm
by Elwood
Looks like Sal nailed it.
Ordnance p/n 7350311, "STOP, rear door step (M43)", Group 1501, quan = 2
Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 6:31 pm
by 06boblee
Sal wrote:This picture might be of some help. It's of a M43 chassis .
M43 REAR a.jpg
Sal

another mystery solved!
Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:33 am
by DJ
Cabin fever must be sitting in, little holes causing a lot of discussion. Hope spring gets here soon.
Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:57 am
by Elwood
DJ wrote:Cabin fever must be sitting in, little holes causing a lot of discussion. Hope spring gets here soon.
I was just thinking about asking which oil to use in my engine, transmission, transfer case, differentials, steering box, and winch...

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:33 pm
by isaac_alaska
i got a 5gallon can of Shell Omala 460 for the low price of "free 99" from the distributor. turns out it has a "5 year shelf life" after which point they gotta toss it. really slippery stuff!
Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:16 am
by just me
Winch lube.
Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:59 pm
by just me
I was surrounded by complete and original ambulances this past weekend. (Over 30 of them.) Not one had those brackets on the rear. The fold up steps I fiddled with were narrower than the stops in the picture. Maybe it was one of those things that got dropped early on like the primer pump and accessory Jack on the dash.
Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:40 am
by w30bob
C'mon guys.......this is easy! They're lightening holes to keep the M37's weight manageable. Dodge had to meet the Army's specification for max gross vehicle weight somehow.
later,
bob
Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:56 am
by Elwood
w30bob wrote:C'mon guys.......this is easy! They're lightening holes to keep the M37's weight manageable. Dodge had to meet the Army's specification for max gross vehicle weight somehow.
later,
bob
Bob, I think you're confusing the M37 with the '63 swiss cheese Pontiac.

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:00 am
by 52PLOWERWAGON
bob I was also thinking weight reduction ......
but then I looked at the rest of the truck
mine does have a super rare weight reduction kit under the headlights

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:28 pm
by w30bob
Travis,
If you're referring to the "rusted out bolt holes in the fender under the headlights" super rare weight reduction...........it ain't so rare!
Think how bad-ass the M37 would be if the body was made out of aluminum instead of steel........it might actually accelerate when you hit the gas!
later,
bob
Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 3:05 am
by 52PLOWERWAGON
if they were aluminum I wouldn't have bought one
think how junk they would be when that aluminum oxidizes
please don't even get me started on aluminum bob

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 3:31 am
by Elwood
Had the G-741 series been built with aluminum bodywork, there would likely have been fewer built (expensive), and also likely be very, very few of them left. The value of the aluminum would have resulted in scrapping of most of them once they reached the end of their military service lives.
The second series of G-741 contact maintenance trucks, the CMU-5, and the USAF R-2 crash truck, did have partial aluminum bodies. I don't know the survival rates, but I'd bet that a lot of these trucks (or at least their light-weight bodywork) went to the scrapper just to recover the aluminum.
Plower, I'm guessing that you aren't a fan of the new Ford trucks?
And Bob, a properly tuned M37 flathead 230 has neck snapping acceleration...from zero to about four miles-per-hour, when the engine hits the rev limit in first gear.

Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 8:55 am
by 52PLOWERWAGON
I am a fan of the new ford trucks .......
I mean I am a huge fan of making fun of all ford trucks
there is a reason I bought a 52 dodge m37
because I needed a real truck
NOTa beercan on wheels
just sayin'
Re: unused holes on the rear crossmember?
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:01 pm
by Elwood
Umm...this may be before your time, but up until the 1970s, beer was sold in steel cans. The switch to aluminum cans is a relatively recent thing (for us old guys, anyways).